On Hist Fic Saturday I am delighted
to host today's stop on the None So Blind Blog Tour and to welcome the author, Alis Hawkins
Hi Alis and a very warm welcome to Jaffreadstoo.
Many
thanks for hosting me at Jaffareadstoo, Jo – it’s such a pleasure to be here as
part of None So Blind’s blog tour.
I
write historical crime fiction because I’m fascinated by the nitty gritty of
how people lived in the past. (And I’m talking about the real past, here, not
the past as defined by Crime Writers Association rules. The CWA believes that
any novel set more than thirty years before its publication date counts as
historical which I find more than slightly alarming. How is 1988 suddenly history?
But I digress.)
When
you write historical fiction set well before the bounds of living memory, you
have to be very aware of the constraints on your characters’ attitudes as well
as their actions. You can’t just dress modern humans up in period clothes and move
them about in the past; the people in your fiction have to reflect the actual experiences,
world-view and understanding of their time.
I
find that I’m constantly trying to distinguish between aspects of humanity that
might be considered hard-wired (pesonality and emotional responses) and aspects
that are simply circumstantial (attitudes and beliefs). It’s harder than it
might sound, especially as current research in psychology suggests that very
little is hard wired, that we’re all the product of the effects of our
environment and our world view on our particular genetic makeup.
But
one thing that does seem clear is that certain types of person have always
existed. Warriors, dreamers, carers, tyrants, healers, poets, priests,
peacemakers, disturbers of the peace... These archetypes are fundamentally
human, they simply present themselves in different forms as the centuries go
by.
And
I’d add another to that list, a type that’s of particular interest to the crime
writer. The psychopath.
Though
a certain type of crime fiction has tended to promote the misleading belief
that psychopath = serial killer, I’m interested in fiction that presents a more
nuanced view. Patricia Highsmith’s Tom [The Talented Mr] Ripley, for instance,
is a much more fascinating (and realistic) example of psychopathy; a
superficially charming and engaging young man who slides through life, his path
lubricated by amorality, spontaneity and clever manipulation.
The
Ripleys of the world are both more intriguing and more troubling than the fictional
Broadmoor candidate because they actually exist all around us. If we believe current
estimates, at least one in a hundred people is a psychopath which means that
even the least well-connected amongst us probably knows at least one. And I’m
far more interested in writing about characters we can all recognise than in
creating the kind of serial killing anomaly with whom we are colossally unlikely
ever to come into contact.
Evidently,
many authors feel the same because crime fiction is full of ‘one percent’
psychpaths. Think about it - anybody who takes the time to plan a murder and
carries it out in cold blood must be well on the way to full-blown psychopathy.
Most of us would turn into a gibbering wreck if we’d so much as killed somebody
by accident, or in the heat of the moment; we would, very swiftly, either give
ourselves up or give ourselves away. Not so the cool-headed, pathologically dishonest
psychopath who feels no remorse at removing inconvenient people from their path.
But
why are such manipulative and unfeeling people so popular in fiction? Is it really
just because our fictional detectives need a credible and elusive bad guy to
investigate? Because we’re happy to see them brought to justice at the end of
the book as we finally see what repellent characters they are under their easy
charm?
Perhaps
the real reason is more subtle and more disturbing. Because, if we’re honest,
psychopaths flaunt personality traits that we may find just a little bit attractive.
They demonstrate a hunger for spontaneity and excitement, have an ability to create
and project an utterly convincing persona, show a capacity to act swiftly and
decisively without being weighed down by thoughts of the emotional and moral
consequences, and can lie fluently and persuasively in order to get what they
want. But, of course, we only find these things engaging if we don’t have to
live with them every day; in fiction, we can observe the psychopath at one
remove, safe on the other side of the page.
I’m fairly
sure that one of the characters in None So Blind would meet the psychiatric
threshold for psychopathy. It wasn’t intentional on my part, that’s just the
way they turned out. But, interestingly, I’m not sure that this character would
have become so psychopathic if they hadn’t had the upbringing they did.
Research seems to indicate that individuals are born with the potential for
psychopathy but that environmental factors in childhood flick an epigenetic
switch to bring the full syndrome online.
So,
are psychopaths born or made?
I
prefer to think they’re made; it makes for a much more interesting book (and a
slightly less alarming world). But I’ll let you read None So Blind and decide
for yourself.
The Dome Press 15 November 2018 My thanks to the author and publisher for my copy of the book and the invitation to be part of this blog tour |
West Wales, 1850.
When an old tree root is dug up, the remains of a young woman are found. Harry Probert-Lloyd, a young barrister forced home from London by encroaching blindness, has been dreading this discovery.
He knows exactly whose those bones they are.
Working with his clerk, John Davies, Harry is determined to expose the guilty, but the investigation turns up more questions than answers.
The search for the truth will prove costly. Will Harry and John be the ones to pay the highest price?
Here's what I thought about None So Blind
This well thought out historical
crime story takes us back to Wales in the mid-nineteenth century and introduces
us to Harry-Probert Jones who has returned to his Welsh childhood home after
working as a London barrister. Harry's homecoming is complicated, for all sorts
of reasons, but it is made worse when the remains of a young woman are found
and Harry gets drawn into the investigation.
What then follows is a murder/mystery which threatens to shatter the small Welsh community, exposing secrets
which have been buried for a long time and as Harry gets drawn deeper and
deeper into the mystery he comes to rely heavily another local man, John Davies, for
help as his clerk. The two men make a good partnership and it was fascinating
to watch them peel back the layers of secrets, some of which go back to the
time of the Rebecca Riots which were a series of protests led by local farmers
against the use of toll roads in rural West Wales.
There’s a dark edginess to the
story with lots of twists and turns and I thoroughly enjoyed trying to piece
together the clues alongside Harry and John. Both men have their own secrets
which are gradually revealed as the story progresses and it was fascinating to
see how their personal stories would eventually play out within the wider scheme of the
plot.
The author writes well and it's obvious that a great deal of research has been done which places everything nicely into historical context. I didn't know anything about the Rebecca Riots, so it was particularly interesting to discover more about why the farmers were so angry. I also found the brief Welsh glossary, at the start of the book, really useful.
None So Blind is the first book
in the Teifi Valley Coroner series, so there was a certain amount of setting
the scene and getting to know the central characters who, I’m sure, will
feature strongly in future novels. The conclusion to the story lends itself nicely to a continuation of the series and I look forward to meeting up again with Harry Probert-Jones and John Davies in future stories.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment - Jaffareadstoo appreciates your interest.